Epistemic state
Observation, report, assumption, inference, speculation, allegation, corroborated finding, adjudicated conclusion, and unknown remain different server states.
Game-system architecture
The intelligence cycle becomes an evidence and institution game—not a violence shortcut.
Players work through incomplete reports, translation, provenance, source independence, competing hypotheses, dissemination, oversight, appeal, correction, institutional pressure, and debriefing.
Provenance objects
Evidence keeps origin, handling chain, transformations, caveats, source groups, custody, corrections, and downstream products.
Institutional pressure
Resources, hierarchy, timelines, political demand, liaison restrictions, classification, oversight, and bureaucratic incentives change mission choices.
Rights and due process
Access, opportunity, association, or disagreement do not prove guilt. Escalation requires evidence, review, appeal, remediation, and reason codes.
Consequences
Success, partial success, correction, public disclosure, source protection, institutional reform, abort, and unresolved uncertainty are valid outcomes.
Server authority
Generated dialogue can supply claims, but it cannot silently create authoritative facts, warrants, rewards, evidence, or mission completion.
Full specification research
Worldwide Intelligence-Cycle Game Systems
The report provides case balance, epistemic-state models, provenance design, rights safeguards, institutional consequences, and non-operational game abstractions.
Review controls
Claims and sources stay inspectable.
Use the claim registry, source-independence audit, contradiction register, and review packet before treating a report statement as current publication truth.